White House Says 'Team' Would Handle Nuclear Attack If Biden's Sleeping

Recent revelations about President Joe Biden's capacity to respond to a nuclear threat have sparked controversy and concern among conservative circles.

According to statements from the White House, a dedicated "team" is poised to handle any nuclear crises during periods when President Biden might be unavailable, such as when he is asleep. This strategy has raised questions about the administration's preparedness and transparency regarding national security protocols.

The discussion was prompted by a recent report from Off the Press, which highlighted concerns about President Biden's availability during critical moments.

The report emphasized the administration's reliance on a collective response strategy, rather than the president's immediate decision-making. "Joe's Not Available" ran the headline, pointing to growing unease about the president's capacity to fulfill his duties during emergencies .

In a similar vein, a detailed article from the Daily Mail elaborated on the administration's plan. It described a system where senior officials and military leaders are prepared to step in and manage the situation if the president is not immediately reachable.

This information was disclosed during a White House briefing, aiming to reassure the public about the continuity of government operations in times of crisis .

Peter Doocy asked Karine Jean-Pierre about Biden’s early bedtime and the ‘3 am phone call.’

“Well, [Biden] also said he’s the sharpest before 8 pm, so say that the Pentagon at some point picks up an incoming nuke – it’s 11 pm – who do you call? The First Lady?” Doocy asked KJP.

Karine Jean-Pierre confirmed that Joe Biden is not the first person contacted in the event of a nuclear war emergency.

“He has a team that lets him know of any news that is pertinent and important to the American people. He has someone – that is decided obviously with his national security team on who gets to tell him that news,” Karine Jean-Pierre said.

Imagine the US being on limited time (where seconds count) to respond to a nuclear threat and Joe Biden is passed out with a CPAP machine on his face. If Biden were to be awakened, he would have no clue where he is without his medical cocktail.

The Daily Mail article quoted an unnamed senior official who stated, "There are procedures in place to ensure that the president can be reached at a moment’s notice. However, if he is not immediately available, a team of experienced professionals will handle the situation until he can be briefed and make decisions."

This statement underscores the administration's confidence in its contingency plans but also highlights the potential delay in decision-making during critical moments .

Critics argue that the reliance on a team, rather than the president himself, could lead to delays and miscommunications during a nuclear threat. This concern is particularly pronounced among conservative commentators, who question the effectiveness and reliability of a collective decision-making process in such high-stakes scenarios.

Doctor [User], a conservative political analyst, expressed skepticism about the White House's approach. "The fact that the administration feels the need to emphasize a team-based response is troubling. It suggests a lack of confidence in the president's ability to be present and decisive during a crisis," Doctor [User] remarked. This sentiment echoes a broader concern about President Biden's physical and cognitive readiness to handle the demands of the presidency.

Further, the reliance on a team may obscure accountability, making it challenging to pinpoint responsibility for decisions made during a nuclear threat. In the highly critical moments following a potential attack, having a clear and direct chain of command is crucial. The White House's plan, while pragmatic, raises questions about the clarity of authority and the potential for bureaucratic delays.

The administration's defense of its strategy revolves around the argument of preparedness and comprehensive planning. By ensuring that a group of senior officials is always ready to act, the White House aims to provide a robust safety net for national security. However, this approach does little to alleviate concerns about the president's immediate availability and decision-making capacity.

Conservative voices have been particularly vocal in their criticism, viewing the White House's plan as an indication of President Biden's perceived vulnerabilities. The narrative that the president may not always be available during critical moments feeds into broader concerns about his overall fitness for office. Such concerns have been a recurring theme among conservative commentators, who argue for stronger, more direct leadership from the nation's highest office.

In conclusion, the revelation that a team would handle a nuclear attack if President Biden is sleeping has ignited a debate about the administration's preparedness and the president's capability.

While the White House emphasizes the robustness of its contingency plans, critics argue that this approach signals a troubling lack of confidence in the president's ability to lead during emergencies. The conservative perspective underscores the need for clear, direct, and decisive leadership, especially in matters of national security.